ArticleGland surgery2021
Analysis of factors influencing postoperative drainage time in breast cancer.
Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and validation of a prognostic model for seroma after breast cancer surgery: a dual-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Analysis of factors affecting the postoperative drainage in patients with abdominoplasty with circumferential liposuction.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Seroma incidence and risk factors in women undergoing mastectomies as surgical breast cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Analysis of risk factors affecting the postoperative drainage after a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- PA-MSHA improves prognosis of patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the related factors affecting the postoperative indwelling time of drainage tubes (hereinafter referred to as drainage time) in breast cancer (BC) and evaluate the effect of
methodsThe clinical data of 165 BC patients in our hospital, including the postoperative drainage time and occurrence of seroma and related complications (such as fever, incision infection, and flap necrosis) after extubation, were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate, multivariate, and stratified analyses were used to determine the correlations between 15 factors including age, body weight, body mass index (BMI), and PA-MSHA preparation, and the postoperative total drainage volume and drainage time.
resultsAge, BMI, and PA-MSHA preparation were independent factors affecting the postoperative drainage volume and drainage time of BC patients. Age and BMI were positively correlated with postoperative drainage volume and drainage time (P≤0.004, P≤0.037). PA-MSHA preparation significantly reduced the postoperative total drainage volume and drainage time (P<0.001), decreased the incidence of seroma after extubation (P=0.024), and did not increase complications (P>0.05).
conclusionsObese and elderly patients were at a significantly high risk of a high drainage volume and long drainage time. Local treatment with PA-MSHA preparation had the advantages of reducing postoperative drainage volume, reducing drainage time, preventing seroma, and not increasing complications, and was a safe and effective treatment. For BC patients aged over 60 years and with a BMI ≥25, the intraoperative local spraying of wounds with PA-MSHA preparation to reduce postoperative drainage times is a valuable option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.