Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070860›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal

Mbarga Manga Joseph Arsene, Podoprigora Irina Viktorovna, Anyutoulou Kitio Linda Davares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Use ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Research on Moringa (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Antimicrobial Potential of the Neem TreeFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  9. Open veterinary journal
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mbarga Manga Joseph ArseneDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Institute of Medicine, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
Podoprigora Irina ViktorovnaDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Institute of Medicine, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
Anyutoulou Kitio Linda DavaresDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Institute of Medicine, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evaluation of medicinal plants' toxicity is a prerequisite prior to their usage. The vertebrate models used for this purpose are often the object of ethical consideration. Though invertebrate models including

aimThe aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential of

methodIn this study, the toxicity of aqueous and ethanolic (80%, v/v) extracts of seven well known plants from Cameroon namely leaves of

resultsWe found that distilled water extracted a more important mass of phytochemical compounds (7.4%-21.2%) compared to ethanolic solution (5.8%-12.4%). LD varied depending on the plant materials and ethanolic extracts (hydroalcoholic extract, (HAE)) were more toxic to

conclusionThe results obtained in this study suggest that

Indexed as

MothsPlants, MedicinalAnimalsCameroonLarvaPlant ExtractsPlant LeavesPlant ExtractsGalleria mellonellaGreater wax mothInsect modelMedicinal plantsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID35070860
PMCPMC8770176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.