ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021
Efficacy and safety of single port robotic radical prostatectomy and multiport robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robot-assisted pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): a systematic comparison of single- and multiple-port techniques.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Current status of single port robotic-assisted reconstructive urology: a systematic review, meta-analysis and structured summary of the available literature.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Single-port and multiport robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis.Prostate international · 2023Review
- Comparison of single-port and multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
- A reply letter for comparison of single-port and multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
- Comparison between single-port robotic radical prostatectomy and multiport robotic radical prostatectomy: reply letter.Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
- The comparison of single port and multiport robot radical prostatectomy in terms of efficacy and safety.Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of single port (SP) robot radical prostatectomy and multiport (MP) robot radical prostatectomy.
methodsUsing the China National Knowledge database, EMBASE, Cochrane library, PubMed, and other databases to obtain relevant research, SP robot radical prostatectomy and MP robot radical prostatectomy were comprehensively evaluated. The software used to evaluate the impact of the results in the selected articles was Review Manager 5.2. Deviation analysis, forest plot analysis, and sensitivity analysis were carried out for the collected data.
resultsA total of 7 related studies that met the criteria were finally included. The data showed that the operation time of MP in the control group was significantly longer than that in the SP group [mean difference (MD) =-13.29; 95% confidence interval (CI): (-17.35, -9.23); P<0.00001; I DISCUSSION: Our results show that SP robotic radical prostatectomy is superior to MP robotic radical prostatectomy in terms of efficacy and safety. SP robot radical prostatectomy is worthy of wide promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.