Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070798›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021

Endangered patients with congenital heart defect during transition-Germany-wide evaluation of medical data from National Register for Congenital Heart Defects (NRCHD).

Julia Remmele, Sandra Schiele, Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz, Peter Ewert, Ulrike M M Bauer, Paul Christian Helm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia RemmeleDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sandra SchieleDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Renate Oberhoffer-FritzInstitute of Preventive Pediatrics Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter EwertDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ulrike M M BauerNational Register for Congenital Heart Defects, DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany.
Paul Christian HelmNational Register for Congenital Heart Defects, DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate care over the entire lifespan is essential in the population with congenital heart defect since the number of patients with congenital heart defect is increasing steadily worldwide. More than 90% survive into adulthood nowadays. The transition from pediatric to adult care in patients with congenital heart defect is a major challenge in clinical practice and often fails. Patients with congenital heart defect are generally at higher risk for different acquired secondary diagnoses. This cross-sectional retrospective study analysed data from the German National Register for Congenital Heart Defects to gain insight into the clinically relevant health-status of the transition population among congenital heart defect patients in Germany.

methodsAdolescents and young adults with congenital heart defect between the ages of 15 to 25 years (which have been defined as the transition generation) were identified using the National Register of Congenital Heart Defects medical database. Out of 55,687 patients with congenital heart defect, 8,834 adolescents and young adults with congenital heart defect [4,063 female (46.0%); 20.3±3.1 years] were included in the statistical analyses. Statistical analyses were conducted using the student's

resultsSeverity of congenital heart defect: simple (23.4%), moderate (45.1%) and complex (31.5%). Most common congenital heart defect: atrial septal defects (14.9%) followed by ventricular septal defects (12.8%) and tetralogy of Fallot (10.5%). Most frequent acquired cardiac diagnosis: arrhythmia (25.5%) followed by secondly pulmonary hypertension (4.5%) and thirdly systemic arterial hypertension (3.6%). Almost 10% had chromosomal abnormalities and other genetic syndromes. Patients had neurological defects overall with 7.3%, followed by musculoskeletal defects with 6.9% and psychological disorders with 5.6%.

conclusionsAdolescents and young adults with congenital heart defect need to bridge the gap between pediatric and adult cardiology as they already show up to 4 cardiac and up to 7 extracardiac acquired secondary diagnoses during the transition period. Otherwise, early detection of an acquired secondary diagnosis, which affects the lives of young adults with congenital heart defect, fails with all its consequences. KEYWORDS: Transition; congenital heart defect (CHD); epidemiology; health services; National Register for Congenital Heart Defects (NRCHD).

Identifiers

PMID35070798
PMCPMC8748471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.