ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2021
Implementation of artificial intelligence in the histological assessment of pulmonary subsolid nodules.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a deep learning model for multicategory pneumonia classification on chest computed tomography: a multicenter and multireader study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Invasiveness assessment by artificial intelligence against intraoperative frozen section for pulmonary nodules ≤ 3 cm.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Deep learning-enhanced radiomics for histologic classification and grade stratification of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A retrospective diagnostic test study on circulating tumor cells and artificial intelligence imaging in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- [Clinical Study of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis System in Predicting the Invasive Subtypes of Early-stage Lung Adenocarcinoma Appearing as Pulmonary Nodules].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical management of subsolid nodules (SSNs) is defined by the suspicion of tumor invasiveness. We sought to develop an artificial intelligent (AI) algorithm for invasiveness assessment of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as radiological SSNs. We investigated the performance of this algorithm in classification of SSNs related to invasiveness.
methodsA retrospective chest computed tomography (CT) dataset of 1,589 SSNs was constructed to develop (85%) and internally test (15%) the proposed AI diagnostic tool, SSNet. Diagnostic performance was evaluated in the hold-out test set and was further tested in an external cohort of 102 SSNs. Three thoracic surgeons and three radiologists were required to evaluate the invasiveness of SSNs on both test datasets to investigate the clinical utility of the proposed SSNet.
resultsIn the differentiation of invasive adenocarcinoma (IA), SSNet achieved a similar area under the curve [AUC; 0.914, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.813-0.987] with that of the 6 doctors (0.900, 95% CI: 0.867-0.922). When interpreting with the assistance of SSNet, the sensitivity of junior doctors, specificity of senior doctor, and their accuracy were significantly improved. In the external test, SSNet (AUC: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.884-1.000) achieved a better AUC than doctors (AUC: 0.883, 95% CI: 0.826-0.939) whose AUC increased (AUC: 0.908, 95% CI: 0.847-0.982) with SSNet assistance. In the histological subtype classifications, SSNet achieved better performance than practicing doctors. The AUCs of doctors were significantly improved with the assistance of SSNet in both 4-category and 3-category classifications to 0.836 (95% CI: 0.811-0.862) and 0.852 (95% CI: 0.825-0.882), respectively.
conclusionsThe AI diagnostic system achieved non-inferior performance to doctors, and will potentially improve diagnostic performance and efficiency in SSN evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.