ArticleAIP advances2022
Simulating stochastic adsorption of diluted solute molecules at interfaces.
Article in AIP advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dimensional analysis of diffusive association rate equations.AIP advances · 2024Article
- Structured Stochastic Curve Fitting without Gradient Calculation.Journal of Computational Mathematics and Data Science · 2024Article
- Measuring the Adsorption Cross Section of YOYO-1 to Immobilized DNA Molecules.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Oil-in-Water Emulsions Probed Using Fluorescence Multivariate-Curve-Resolution Spectroscopy.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024Article
- Nanostructured Black Silicon as a Stable and Surface-Sensitive Platform for Time-Resolved In Situ Electrochemical Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Why Should the Reaction Order of a Bimolecular Reaction be 2.33 Instead of 2?The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This report uses Monte Carlo simulations to connect stochastic single-molecule and ensemble surface adsorption of molecules from dilute solutions. Monte Carlo simulations often use a fundamental time resolution to simulate each discrete step for each molecule. The adsorption rate obtained from such a simulation surprisingly contains an error compared to the results obtained from the traditional method. Simulating adsorption kinetics is interesting in many processes, such as mass transportation within cells, the kinetics of drug-receptor interactions, membrane filtration, and other general reaction kinetics in diluted solutions. Thus, it is important to understand the origin of the disagreement and find a way to correct the results. This report reviews the traditional model, explains the single-molecule simulations, and introduces a method to correct the results of adsorption rate. For example, one can bin finer time steps into time steps of interest to simulate the fractal diffusion or simply introduce a correction factor for the simulations. Then two model systems, self-assembled monolayer (SAM) and biosensing on the patterned surface, are simulated to check the accuracy of the equations. It is found that the adsorption rate of SAM is highly dependent on the conditions and the uncertainty is large. However, the biosensing system is relatively accurate. This is because the concentration gradient near the interface varies significantly with reaction conditions for SAMs while relatively stable for the biosensing system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.