ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2021
Prognosis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors after endoscopic resection: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection combined with band ligation versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (≤ 10 mm): a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- NANETS Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stage I-III rectal neuroendocrine tumors.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Guideline
- Is salvage treatment necessary after incomplete resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy, Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Approaches (EMR, ESD and TAMIS) for Early Rectal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection and hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for stage 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection of 1-1.5 cm sized grade 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumor: A retrospective study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Gender-based differences in survival outcomes of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for stage 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes between solitary and multiple rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a propensity score-matched study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?Clinical endoscopy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of endoscopic resection in patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) which are less than 20 mm in diameter remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and outcomes of different types of endoscopic resection in patients with NETs.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis and follow-up on 98 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for rectal NETs between August 2010 and October 2019 at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, China. The lesions were preoperatively classified according to their endoscopic morphology and measured by endoscopic ultrasound. Patients were divided into modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) groups depending on the endoscopic treatment they received. The
resultsThe average diameter of the 98 NETs was 6.29±2.90 mm (range, 2-15 mm). The
conclusionsModified EMR and ESD are safe and effective endoscopic approaches for the resection of rectal NETs ≤15 mm in diameter. Endoscopic resection requires a comprehensive preoperative evaluation of risk factors including the depth of tumor invasion and tumor diameter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.