ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2021
Social determinants of health associated with poor outcome for rural patients following resected pancreatic cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with physical and mental health symptoms in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based cohort study.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage and pancreatic cancer among veterans.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Social Vulnerability as a Neighborhood-Level Determinant of Pancreatic Cancer Survivorship: A National Analysis of Veterans Affairs Patients.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Are Access Costs and Income Associated With Treatment Decision-Making and Clinical Outcomes in Rural Patients Presenting With Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancy?Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Trends in pancreatic cancer mortality in the United States 1999-2020: a CDC database population-based study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Health-Related Social Needs in Patients With Gastroparesis: Relationships to Symptom Severity and Quality of Life.Gastro hep advances · 2024Article
- Review
- Association between Rural Residence and Processes of Care in Pancreatic Cancer Treatment.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Article
- High social risk and mortality. A prospective study in community-dwelling older adults living in a rural Ecuadorian village.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of rurality on outcome for patients who had resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unclear. We hypothesize that poor outcomes for rural patients are associated with adverse social determinants of health (SDoH). The objective of this study is to assess the difference in overall survival (OS) of PDAC patients between rural, urban, and contributing factors.
methodsA cohort of 25,536 patients diagnosed with stage I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2003 to 2011 and underwent resection were evaluated from the National Cancer Database. Socioeconomic/demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment variables were compared between rural and urban residences. The 5-year OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was used to assess factors associated with OS. P value <0.05 was considered significant.
resultsIn univariate analysis, the rural residence was a predictor of poor OS. The 5-year OS for rural (N=4,389) and urban (N=21,147) was 18.8% (95% CI: 17.4-20.2%) and 22.3% (95% CI: 21.6-22.9%; P<0.0001), respectively. The risk of all causes of death was 10.3% higher (P<0.0001) in rural than urban patients. In multivariable analysis, rurality was not an independent predictor of OS (P=0.407). Independent predictors of worse OS included adverse social determinants of health associated with the rural population and these included a low income (P<0.0001), low education level (P<0.01), low insurance status (P<0.01), and treatment at a low-volume facility (P<0.0001).
conclusionsRural/urban outcome disparities for resected stage I-III pancreatic cancer outcome can be explained by adverse social determinants of health associated with rural population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.