Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070384›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2021

Artificial intelligence-assisted decision making for prognosis and drug efficacy prediction in lung cancer patients: a narrative review.

Jingwei Li, Jiayang Wu, Zhehao Zhao, Qiran Zhang, Jun Shao, Chengdi Wang, Zhixin Qiu, Weimin Li

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence in lung cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Novel tools for early diagnosis and precision treatment based on artificial intelligence.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Prognostic value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jingwei LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Medical School/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jiayang WuWest China School of Public Health/West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhehao ZhaoWest China Medical School/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiran ZhangWest China Medical School/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jun ShaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Medical School/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chengdi WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Medical School/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhixin QiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Medical School/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Weimin LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Medical School/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this review, we aim to present frontier studies in patients with lung cancer as it related to artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision-making and summarize the latest advances, challenges and future trend in this field.

backgroundDespite increasing survival rate in cancer patients over the last decades, lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The early diagnosis, accurate evaluation and individualized treatment are vital approaches to improve the survival rate of patients with lung cancer. Thus, decision making based on these approaches requires accuracy and efficiency beyond manpower. Recent advances in AI and precision medicine have provided a fertile environment for the development of AI-based models. These models have the potential to assist radiologists and oncologists in detecting lung cancer, predicting prognosis and developing personalized treatment plans for better outcomes of the patients.

methodsWe searched literature from 2000 through July 31

conclusionsAI, especially for those based on deep learning and radiomics, is capable of assisting clinical decision making from many aspects, for its quantitatively interpretation of patients' information and its potential to deal with the dynamics, individual differences and heterogeneity of lung cancer. Hopefully, remaining problems such as insufficient data and poor interpretability may be solved to put AI-based models into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)drug efficacylung cancerprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35070384
PMCPMC8743400
OpenAlexW3201351048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.