Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070364›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021

The impact of marginal lung function on outcomes in the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

Hiroko Nakahama, Mark Jaradeh, Zaid M Abdelsattar, James Lubawski, Wickii T Vigneswaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hiroko NakahamaDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Mark JaradehDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Zaid M AbdelsattarDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
James LubawskiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Wickii T VigneswaranDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of marginal lung function on outcomes after lung resection has traditionally been studied in the context of open thoracic surgery. Its impact on postoperative outcomes in the era of minimally invasive lung resection is unclear.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we included adult patients who underwent minimally invasive lung resection at our institution between January 2017 and May 2020 for known malignancy or lung nodule. Marginal lung function was defined as pre-operative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and/or diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide <60% of predicted. Our outcomes included a composite outcome of pulmonary morbidity and/or 30- and 90-day mortality, and hospital length of stay. We used multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models to identify associations with outcomes, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox models to estimate survival.

resultsOf 300 patients, 88 (29%) had marginal lung function. Patients in the marginal group were more likely to be female (69%

conclusionsIn the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, lung resection in patients with marginal lung function may be considered in select patients. These findings aid in the selection consideration and counseling of this patient population.

Indexed as

marginal lung functionMinimally invasive thoracic surgeryrobotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS)

Identifiers

PMID35070364
PMCPMC8743406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.