Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070355›Full record

ArticleFuture science OA2022

Outcome of prenatal diagnosis of clubfoot: a single institution experience.

Wael Abdallah, Malek Nassar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future science OA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Prenatal Counseling for Congenital Clubfoot.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wael AbdallahDepartment of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Hôtel-Dieu de France University Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-048X
Malek NassarDepartment of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Hôtel-Dieu de France University Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8500-661X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis of clubfoot (CF), risk factors and outcomes in postnatal. PATIENTS &

methodsMaternal characteristics, sonographic signs and postnatal outcomes were evaluated in 60 patients with a prenatal diagnosis of CF between 2007 and 2020.

resultsThe rate of antenatal diagnosis of CF was 3.72/1000 live births. The false-positive rate was 6.67%. 66.7% of fetuses had bilateral CF and 33.3% had unilateral CF; 58.3% were isolated and 41.7% were complex; 58.3% were males and 41.7% were female; 16.7% were multiple pregnancies and 10% were cases of consanguinity.

conclusionThe accuracy of the diagnosis of CF depends on the operator's skills. A significant relationship is demonstrated between the interruption of pregnancy, consanguinity, laterality and complexity.

Indexed as

clubfootdiagnostic accuracyfetal outcomesprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID35070355
PMCPMC8765115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.