Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070340›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

Exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic environment and generosity.

P Brañas-Garza, D Jorrat, A Alfonso, A M Espín, T García Muñoz, J Kovářík

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Substitution of social sustainability concerns under the Covid-19 pandemic.Ecological economics : the journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Solidarity and fairness in times of crisis.Journal of economic behavior & organization · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P Brañas-GarzaLoyola Behavioral Lab & Department of Economics, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8456-6009
D JorratLoyola Behavioral Lab & Department of Economics, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5038-3877
A AlfonsoLoyola Behavioral Lab & Department of Economics, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.
A M EspínDepartment of Anthropology, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
T García MuñozDepartment of Quantitative Economics, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
J KováříkUniversidad del País Vasco UPV-EHU, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0436-929X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report data from an online experiment which allows us to study how generosity changed over a 6-day period during the initial explosive growth of the COVID-19 pandemic in Andalusia, Spain, while the country was under a strict lockdown. Participants (

Indexed as

COVID-19experimentsgenerositysocial preferences

Identifiers

PMID35070340
PMCPMC8753156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.