Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070315›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Impact of motivational interviewing as a follow-up to an exercise intervention among women with or at risk for metabolic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

Kameron B Suire, Ashley Peart, Jan Kavookjian, Danielle D Wadsworth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kameron B SuireDivision of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Desoto, KS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-7600
Ashley PeartExercise Adherence and Obesity Prevention Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Jan KavookjianHealth Outcomes Research and Policy, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Danielle D WadsworthExercise Adherence and Obesity Prevention Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Auburn University · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWomen have a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome than their male counterparts, and interventions should target women with or at risk for metabolic syndrome. The objective of this study was to compare two intervention strategies on long-term outcomes following the completion of an exercise intervention.

methodsTwenty-six women (

resultsMixed ANOVAs revealed a significant effect for group × time for body fat percentage

conclusionsMotivational interviewing may be a more impactful solution to extend the effects of exercise intervention studies compared to a self-regulation-based mobile messaging control group. Future interventions should focus on increasing sample size, utilizing more objective measures of body composition, utilizing booster sessions, and increasing the length of follow-up periods.

Indexed as

Body compositionbone healthdiabetes/endocrinologyrandomized trialwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID35070315
PMCPMC8771748
OpenAlexW4205648584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.