Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070299›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2022

Preliminary experiences of PET/MRI in predicting complete response in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Chikako Sekine, Nachiko Uchiyama, Chikashi Watase, Takeshi Murata, Sho Shiino, Kenjiro Jimbo, Eriko Iwamoto, Shin Takayama, Hiroaki Kurihara, Kaishi Satomi and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role ofRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparison of MRI vs. [Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Breast PET/MRI Hybrid Imaging and Targeted Tracers.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chikako SekineDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Nachiko UchiyamaDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Chikashi WataseDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Takeshi MurataDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Sho ShiinoDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Kenjiro JimboDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Eriko IwamotoDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Shin TakayamaDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Hiroaki KuriharaDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Kaishi SatomiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Masayuki YoshidaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Takayuki KinoshitaDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo 152-8902, Japan.
Akihiko SutoDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
National Hospital Organization · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical response predictions through image examinations after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer is important. The present study aimed to evaluate the utility of a novel imaging modality, positron-emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), in predicting the pathological complete response (pCR) to NAC in patients with early breast cancer. A total of 74 patients underwent PET/MRI, mammography (MG), including tomosynthesis, and ultrasound (US) after NAC. The complete response was predicted using each modality and these outcomes were compared accordingly. In terms of PET/MRI, complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and the absence of enhanced lesions with contrast enhanced MRI. In MG and US, undetectable lesions were considered as CR. The background and tumor characteristics of patients were also analyzed between the pCR and non-pCR cases. Overall, 18 (24.3%) of the 74 patients achieved pCR. The overall sensitivity and specificity of PET/MRI were 72.2 and 78.6%, respectively. Both the sensitivity in hormone receptor (HR)-positive cases and the specificity in HR-negative cases were 100%. HR-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cases demonstrated a significant association with pCR compared with HR-positive cases and triple negative cases (P=0.017). Furthermore, patients with 'mass' type lesions evaluated by MRI before NAC experienced pCR with a higher frequency than those with 'non-mass' type lesions. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.018). In conclusion, PET/MRI is a different diagnostic approach that utilizes a multi-modality system. It demonstrates reasonable diagnostic accuracies of the responses of NAC with reference to hormonal subtypes in breast cancer.

Indexed as

early breast cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapypathological complete responsepositron-emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35070299
PMCPMC8764658
OpenAlexW4200375251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.