Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070024›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2021

Primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis: A comparison of different strategies.

Ângelo Zambam de Mattos, Carlos Terra, Alberto Queiroz Farias, Paulo Lisboa Bittencourt, Alliance of Brazilian Centers for Cirrhosis Care–the ABC Group

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Guidelines on the management of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhotic portal hypertension].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ângelo Zambam de MattosGraduate Program in Medicine: Hepatology, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050-170, Brazil. angmattos@hotmail.com.
Carlos TerraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20950000, Brazil.
Alberto Queiroz FariasDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil.
Paulo Lisboa BittencourtGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Português, Salvador 40140-901, Brazil.
Alliance of Brazilian Centers for Cirrhosis Care–the ABC Group
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices bleed at a yearly rate of 5%-15%, and, when variceal hemorrhage develops, mortality reaches 20%. Patients are deemed at high risk of bleeding when they present with medium or large-sized varices, when they have red signs on varices of any size and when they are classified as Child-Pugh C and have varices of any size. In order to avoid variceal bleeding and death, individuals with cirrhosis at high risk of bleeding must undergo primary prophylaxis, for which currently recommended strategies are the use of traditional non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) (

Indexed as

CarvedilolCirrhosisEndoscopic variceal ligationEsophageal varicesNon-selective beta-blockersPrimary prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID35070024
PMCPMC8716979
OpenAlexW4200069864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.