Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069837›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022

Analysis of long-term anatomic results of radical mastoidectomy.

Horia Mocanu, Adela-Ioana Mocanu, Gabriella Coadă, Alexandru Bonciu, Mihai-Adrian Schipor, Marian Rădulescu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ear canal reconstruction in mastoid obliteration surgery for cholesteatoma or radical cavity: a review of the literature.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Horia MocanuDepartment of ENT and HNS, Faculty of Medicine, 'Titu Maiorescu' University, 031593 Bucharest, Romania.
Adela-Ioana MocanuDepartment of ENT and HNS, Polimed Medical Center, 040067 Bucharest, Romania.
Gabriella CoadăDepartment of ENT and HNS, 'Sf. Maria' Clinical Hospital, 011172 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru BonciuDepartment of ENT and HNS, 'Dr. Carol Davila' Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania.
Mihai-Adrian SchiporTechnical University of Munich, Institute of Astronomical and Physical Geodesy, D-80333 Munich, Germany.
Marian RădulescuDepartment of ENT and HNS, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROTechnical University of Munich · DETitu Maiorescu University · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A long-term, retrospective, non-controlled study was performed on the drainage results of mastoidectomy (both radical and modified radical) and the relevant statistical factors that could influence the anatomic outcome were defined. The present study took into consideration the same cohort of 200 patients we have communicated with before in our previous studies concerning the long-term functional results of mastoidectomy and long-term results of ossicular replacement with biovitroceramic prosthesis. The patients were clinically followed for the same period of 8.12 years. The drainage (anatomic) results, similar to previously published functional results, were defined by analytical function of the severity and the period of evolution of disease. The main goal was to define the situations and factors (presence of complications, type of disease, type of tympanic perforation or status of ossicular chain) that influenced the drainage results that could provide us with some type of anatomical prognosis. The follow-up started at the moment of complete epithelization for each cavity as time represents the main study comparison criteria. Drainage failure was assessed by the number of otorrhea episodes. It was concluded that practically and ideally, a maximum of 84% of the mastoid and petrous cells can be cleaned out. The results of 78% drainage success are congruent to this theory. The remaining 16% of cells may contain irreversible lesions.

Indexed as

anatomic resultsatticcholesteatomadrainagemastoidectomymiddle earotitis mediaquality of life

Identifiers

PMID35069837
PMCPMC8753967
OpenAlexW4200340593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.