Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069826›Full record

ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022

Congenitally missing second permanent molars in non-syndromic patients (Review).

Alexandru-Titus Farcașiu, Rodica Luca, Andreea Didilescu, Ioana-Andreea Stanciu, Catalina Farcasiu, Arina Vinereanu, Aneta Munteanu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandru-Titus FarcașiuDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 032799, Romania.
Rodica LucaDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 032799, Romania.
Andreea DidilescuDepartment of Embryology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 032799, Romania.
Ioana-Andreea StanciuDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 032799, Romania.
Catalina FarcasiuDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 032799, Romania.
Arina VinereanuDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 032799, Romania.
Aneta MunteanuDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 032799, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypodontia (tooth agenesis) is regarded as the most common congenital dental anomaly. The present review discusses the epidemiological characteristics of congenitally missing second permanent molars (CMSPMs) within a systematic review of the literature. The review was based on Pubmed library associated with the search of various scientific databases or academic resources, improved by hand search of reference lists. The terms 'hypodontia' or 'anodontia' in combination with 'prevalence' or 'epidemiology' were searched in the data sources for studies published between January 2001 and December 2020. Abstracts of non-English papers were also analyzed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Study provided precise data about CMSPMs, even if no second permanent molar was reportedly missing; ii) the number of CMSPMs distributed by jaw was provided and iii) studies on subjects >3 years were used. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Studies on patients with history of trauma of the maxilla or the mandible, any type of syndrome affecting bone metabolism, metabolic disorders, previous extraction or tooth loss due to dental caries, cleft lip and palate; ii) studies performed on cohorts of patients with hypodontia and iii) studies reporting data including third molars, except for those that presented sufficient data to perform correct calculations. A total of 79 studies were selected, accumulating a population of 281,968 people, with an average sample size of 3,524.60±11,255.25. The prevalence of CMSPMs (IpHSPM) was 2.79±3.16% among all missing teeth (1.03±1.59% for upper CMSPMs and 1.76±2.32% for lower CMSPMs; P=0.011). There were no significant differences (P=0.250) in IpHSPM between men (1.59±1.52%) and women (2.13±1.67%). However, significant differences were recorded between continents. Furthermore, lower CMSPMs were found more frequently in orthodontic samples (P=0.033). The prevalence of CMSPMs is low compared with the overall prevalence of CM teeth. Despite the rarity of these anomalies, early detection is important to enable practitioners to plan and start treatment at the best time for optimal results.

Indexed as

epidemiologyhypodontianon-syndromic patientsprevalencesecond permanent molar

Identifiers

PMID35069826
PMCPMC8756395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.