Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069808›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2022

FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) increases not efficacy but toxicity compared with single-agent irinotecan as a second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Xiaowei Zhang, Ran Duan, Yusheng Wang, Xin Liu, Wen Zhang, Xiaodong Zhu, Zhiyu Chen, Wei Shen, Yifu He, Hong Qiang Wang and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02935764 (Phase III Study of Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Regimen), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02935764 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Phase III Study of Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Regimen (FOLFIRI) Versus Irinotecan Monodrug as Second-line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorFudan UniversityRan2016Enrolled164ConditionsColorectal CarcinomaArmsIrinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Resistance to TOP-1 Inhibitors: Good Old Drugs Still Can Surprise Us.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. PROX1-mediated epigenetic silencing ofInternational journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaowei ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ran DuanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yusheng WangShanxi Tumor Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wen ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodong ZhuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiyu ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ShenXinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yifu HeDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Science and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Hong Qiang WangDepartment of Oncology, Zhejiang Province Zhoushan Hospital, Zhoushan, China.
Mingzhu HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chenchen WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4930-3187
Zhe ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoying ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lixin QiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianfeng LuoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xuedan ShengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weijian GuoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNFudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CNZhoushan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFOLFIRI [irinotecan, folinic acid (CF), and fluorouracil] is considered a standard second-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed first-line XELOX/FOLFOX regimens. However, it remains unknown whether fluorouracil is still necessary in this case. This trial was designed to test the superiority of FOLFIRI over single-agent irinotecan as a second-line treatment for patients with mCRC.

methodsThis randomized clinical trial was conducted in five hospitals in China. From 4 November 2016 to 17 January 2020, patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed unresectable mCRC and who had failed first-line XELOX/FOLFOX regimens were screened and enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either FOLFIRI or irinotecan. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

resultsA total of 172 patients with mCRC were randomly treated with FOLFIRI (

conclusionThis is the first head-to-head trial showing that single-agent irinotecan yielded PFS, OS, and ORR similar to FOLFIRI, with a more favorable toxicity profile; therefore, it might be a more favorable standard chemotherapy regimen for mCRC patients who failed first-line XELOX/FOLFOX regimens.

trial registrationThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02935764, registered 17 October 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02935764.

Indexed as

chemotherapyFOLFIRIirinotecanmetastatic colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID35069808
PMCPMC8771434
OpenAlexW4205266052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.