Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069738›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2022

Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of Long Noncoding RNAs in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Xiaoting Zhang, Yue Su, Xian Fu, Jing Xiao, Guicheng Qin, Mengli Yu, Xiaofeng Li, Guihong Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoting ZhangShenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-3331
Yue SuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8987-4131
Xian FuShenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7982-1092
Jing XiaoShenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9661-6907
Guicheng QinShenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-7303
Mengli YuShenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0642-6470
Xiaofeng LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3946-5791
Guihong ChenShenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-1483
Shenzhen Bao'an District People's Hospital · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNPeking University Shenzhen Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is the most common type of lung cancer accounting for 40% to 51%. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to play a significant role in the invasion, migration, and proliferation of lung cancer tissue cells. However, systematic identification of lncRNA signatures and evaluation of the prognostic value for LUSC are still an urgent problem. In this work, LUSC RNA-seq data were collected from TCGA database, and the limma R package was used to screen differentially expressed lncRNAs (DElncRNAs). In total, 216 DElncRNAs were identified between the LUSC and normal samples. lncRNAs associated with prognosis were calculated using univariate Cox regression analysis. The overall survival (OS) prognostic model containing 10 lncRNAs and the disease-free survival (DFS) prognostic model consisting of 11 lncRNAs were constructed using a machine learning-based algorithm, systematic LASSO-Cox regression analysis. We found that the survival rate of samples in the high-risk group was lower than that in the low-risk group. Results of ROC curves showed that both the OS and DFS risk score had better prognostic effects than the clinical characteristics, including age, stage, gender, and TNM. Two lncRNAs (LINC00519 and FAM83A-AS1) that were commonly identified as prognostic factors in both models could be further investigated for their clinical significance and therapeutic value. In conclusion, we constructed lncRNA prognostic models with considerable prognostic effect for both OS and DFS of LUSC.

Identifiers

PMID35069738
PMCPMC8776467
OpenAlexW4206816947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.