Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069729›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2022

Futuristic Developments and Applications in Endoluminal Stenting.

Joel Ferreira-Silva, Renato Medas, Mohit Girotra, Monique Barakat, James H Tabibian, Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Best Practices in Esophageal, Gastroduodenal, and Colonic Stenting.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Joel Ferreira-SilvaGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal.
Renato MedasGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal.
Mohit GirotraDigestive Health Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Monique BarakatDivision of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, California, USA.
James H TabibianDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, USA.
Eduardo Rodrigues-PintoGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2239-1650
Universidade do Porto · PTStanford University · USSwedish Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic stenting is a well-established option for the treatment of malignant obstruction, temporary management of benign strictures, and sealing transmural defects, as well as drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and biliary obstruction. In recent years, in addition to expansion in indications for endoscopic stenting, considerable strides have been made in stent technology, and several types of devices with advanced designs and materials are continuously being developed. In this review, we discuss the important developments in stent designs and novel indications for endoluminal and transluminal stenting. Our discussion specifically focuses on (i) biodegradable as well as (ii) irradiating and drug-eluting stents for esophageal, gastroduodenal, biliary, and colonic indications, (iii) endoscopic stenting in inflammatory bowel disease, and (iv) lumen-apposing metal stent.

Identifiers

PMID35069729
PMCPMC8767390
OpenAlexW4206702478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.