Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069721›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

EEG Channel Selection Using Multiobjective Cuckoo Search for Person Identification as Protection System in Healthcare Applications.

Zaid Abdi Alkareem Alyasseri, Osama Ahmad Alomari, Mohammed Azmi Al-Betar, Mohammed A Awadallah, Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem, Mazin Abed Mohammed, Seifedine Kadry, V Rajinikanth, Seungmin Rho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zaid Abdi Alkareem AlyasseriITRDC, University of Kufa, P.O. Box 21, Najaf, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-9298
Osama Ahmad AlomariMLALP Research Group, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Mohammed Azmi Al-BetarArtificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), College of Engineering and Information Technology, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1980-1791
Mohammed A AwadallahDepartment of Computer Science, Al-Aqsa University, P.O. Box 4051, Gaza, State of Palestine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7815-8946
Karrar Hameed AbdulkareemCollege of Agriculture, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Iraq.
Mazin Abed MohammedCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Anbar, Anbar 31001, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9030-8102
Seifedine KadryDepartment of Applied Data Science, Noroff University College, 4608 Kristiansand, Norway.
V RajinikanthDepartment of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, St. Joseph's College of Engineering, Chennai 600119, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3897-4460
Seungmin RhoDepartment of Industrial Security, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1936-6785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal presents an excellent potential for a new person identification technique. Several studies defined the EEG with unique features, universality, and natural robustness to be used as a new track to prevent spoofing attacks. The EEG signals are a visual recording of the brain's electrical activities, measured by placing electrodes (channels) in various scalp positions. However, traditional EEG-based systems lead to high complexity with many channels, and some channels have critical information for the identification system while others do not. Several studies have proposed a single objective to address the EEG channel for person identification. Unfortunately, these studies only focused on increasing the accuracy rate without balancing the accuracy and the total number of selected EEG channels. The novelty of this paper is to propose a multiobjective binary version of the cuckoo search algorithm (MOBCS-KNN) to find optimal EEG channel selections for person identification. The proposed method (MOBCS-KNN) used a weighted sum technique to implement a multiobjective approach. In addition, a KNN classifier for EEG-based biometric person identification is used. It is worth mentioning that this is the initial investigation of using a multiobjective technique with EEG channel selection problem. A standard EEG motor imagery dataset is used to evaluate the performance of the MOBCS-KNN. The experiments show that the MOBCS-KNN obtained accuracy of 93.86% using only 24 sensors with AR20 autoregressive coefficients. Another critical point is that the MOBCS-KNN finds channels not too close to each other to capture relevant information from all over the head. In conclusion, the MOBCS-KNN algorithm achieves the best results compared with metaheuristic algorithms. Finally, the recommended approach can draw future directions to be applied to different research areas.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyAlgorithmsDelivery of Health CareElectrodesHumans

Identifiers

PMID35069721
PMCPMC8769868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.