Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069362›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Is Motor Milestone Assessment in Infancy Valid and Scaled Equally Across Sex, Birth Weight, and Gestational Age? Findings From the Millennium Cohort Study.

Denise de Almeida Maia, Farid Bardid, Tobias Koch, Paola Okuda, George Ploubidis, Anders Nordahl-Hansen, Michael Eid, Hugo Cogo-Moreira

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Denise de Almeida MaiaDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Farid BardidSchool of Education, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Tobias KochDepartment of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.
Paola OkudaDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
George PloubidisDepartment of Social Science, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anders Nordahl-HansenDepartment of Education, ICT and Learning, Østfold University College, Halden, Norway.
Michael EidDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hugo Cogo-MoreiraDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is the assessment of motor milestones valid and scaled equivalently for all infants? It is not only important to understand if the way we use gross and fine motor scores are appropriate for monitoring motor milestones but also to determine if these scores are confounded by specific infant characteristics. Therefore, the aim of the study is to investigate the latent structure underlying motor milestone assessment in infancy and measurement invariance across sex, birth weight, and gestational age. For this study, the birth cohort data from the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) was used, which includes the assessment of eight motor milestone tasks from the Denver Developmental Screening Test in 9-month-old infants (

Indexed as

assessmentconfirmatory factor analysisdifferential item functioninginfantsmotor development milestones

Identifiers

PMID35069362
PMCPMC8769219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.