Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069163›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2021

Age-Specific Adult Rat Brain MRI Templates and Tissue Probability Maps.

Eilidh MacNicol, Paul Wright, Eugene Kim, Irene Brusini, Oscar Esteban, Camilla Simmons, Federico E Turkheimer, Diana Cash

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Eilidh MacNicolDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul WrightSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Eugene KimDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Irene BrusiniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oscar EstebanDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Camilla SimmonsDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Federico E TurkheimerDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Diana CashDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEStanford University · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_14105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-specific resources in human MRI mitigate processing biases that arise from structural changes across the lifespan. There are fewer age-specific resources for preclinical imaging, and they only represent developmental periods rather than adulthood. Since rats recapitulate many facets of human aging, it was hypothesized that brain volume and each tissue's relative contribution to total brain volume would change with age in the adult rat. Data from a longitudinal study of rats at 3, 5, 11, and 17 months old were used to test this hypothesis. Tissue volume was estimated from high resolution structural images using

Indexed as

agingmorphometrypreclinical imagingSprague-Dawleytemplatetissue priorVBM

Identifiers

PMID35069163
PMCPMC8777032
OpenAlexW4206563681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.