Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069125›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2021

Effects of Cortical Cooling on Sound Processing in Auditory Cortex and Thalamus of Awake Marmosets.

Marcus Jeschke, Frank W Ohl, Xiaoqin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus JeschkeLaboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Frank W OhlDepartment Systems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Xiaoqin WangLaboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences · DEGerman Primate Center · DEJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

NEURAL BASIS OF COMMUNICATION SOUND PERCEPTIONR01DC003180 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAOQIN · 1997 to 2024
$12.0M
Auditory-Vocal Interaction Mechanisms in PrimatesR01DC005808 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAOQIN · 2003 to 2022
$8.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003180NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The auditory thalamus is the central nexus of bottom-up connections from the inferior colliculus and top-down connections from auditory cortical areas. While considerable efforts have been made to investigate feedforward processing of sounds in the auditory thalamus (medial geniculate body, MGB) of non-human primates, little is known about the role of corticofugal feedback in the MGB of awake non-human primates. Therefore, we developed a small, repositionable cooling probe to manipulate corticofugal feedback and studied neural responses in both auditory cortex and thalamus to sounds under conditions of normal and reduced cortical temperature. Cooling-induced increases in the width of extracellularly recorded spikes in auditory cortex were observed over the distance of several hundred micrometers away from the cooling probe. Cortical neurons displayed reduction in both spontaneous and stimulus driven firing rates with decreased cortical temperatures. In thalamus, cortical cooling led to increased spontaneous firing and either increased or decreased stimulus driven activity. Furthermore, response tuning to modulation frequencies of temporally modulated sounds and spatial tuning to sound source location could be altered (increased or decreased) by cortical cooling. Specifically, best modulation frequencies of individual MGB neurons could shift either toward higher or lower frequencies based on the vector strength or the firing rate. The tuning of MGB neurons for spatial location could both sharpen or widen. Elevation preference could shift toward higher or lower elevations and azimuth tuning could move toward ipsilateral or contralateral locations. Such bidirectional changes were observed in many parameters which suggests that the auditory thalamus acts as a filter that could be adjusted according to behaviorally driven signals from auditory cortex. Future work will have to delineate the circuit elements responsible for the observed effects.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAnimalsCallithrixGeniculate BodiesThalamusWakefulnessauditory cortexauditory thalamuscoolingcorticofugal feedbackinactivationspatial processingtemporal modulations

Identifiers

PMID35069125
PMCPMC8766342
OpenAlexW4205606223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.