Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069062›Full record

ReviewDer Pneumologe2022

[Overview on pulmonary rehabilitation].

Daniela Leitl, Rainer Glöckl

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pneumologe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniela LeitlForschungsinstitut für pneumologische Rehabilitation, Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land, Malterhöh 1, 83471 Schönau am Königssee, Deutschland.
Rainer GlöcklForschungsinstitut für pneumologische Rehabilitation, Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land, Malterhöh 1, 83471 Schönau am Königssee, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based multidisciplinary treatment for patients with chronic respiratory diseases. The indications for PR prescription are given if there is a rehabilitation capability, a need for rehabilitation and a beneficial rehabilitation prognosis. The aims of PR are to reduce symptoms and to improve the quality of life and the patients' physical capacity. The effectiveness of PR is well-proven for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at the highest level of evidence and for non-COPD patients with an increasing level of evidence based on randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. The treatment content of PR is individually adapted to the patients' needs by a multimodal and multidisciplinary treatment team. To maintain the rehabilitation benefits of PR there is the possibility to participate in outpatient follow-up programs as well as to use digital technologies.

Indexed as

Breathing exercisesEducationExercise trainingPhysical performanceQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID35069062
PMCPMC8764642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.