Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35068970›Full record

ArticlePhytoKeys2021

An image dataset of cleared, x-rayed, and fossil leaves vetted to plant family for human and machine learning.

Peter Wilf, Scott L Wing, Herbert W Meyer, Jacob A Rose, Rohit Saha, Thomas Serre, N Rubén Cúneo, Michael P Donovan, Diane M Erwin, María A Gandolfo and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PhytoKeys, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Peter WilfDepartment of Geosciences and Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Pennsylvania State University University Park United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6813-1937
Scott L WingDepartment of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC United States of America.
Herbert W MeyerFlorissant Fossil Beds National Monument, National Park Service, Florissant, CO 80816, USA Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument, National Park Service Florissant United States of America.
Jacob A RoseSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA Brown University Providence United States of America.
Rohit SahaDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA Museo Paleontológico E. Feruglio Trelew Argentina.
Thomas SerreDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA Museo Paleontológico E. Feruglio Trelew Argentina.
N Rubén CúneoCONICET-Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, Trelew 9100, Chubut, Argentina epartment of Paleobotany and Paleoecology, Cleveland Museum of Natural History Cleveland United States of America.
Michael P DonovanDepartment of Paleobotany and Paleoecology, Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA University of California-Berkeley Berkeley United States of America.
Diane M ErwinUniversity of California-Berkeley, Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Cornell University Ithaca United States of America.
María A GandolfoLH Bailey Hortorium, Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Front Royal United States of America.
Erika González-AkreConservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Front Royal, VA, 22630, USA Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History Chicago United States of America.
Fabiany HerreraNegaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA Yale University New Haven United States of America.
Shusheng HuDivision of Paleobotany, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Ambiente INIBIOMA, CONICET-UNComa San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina.
Ari IglesiasInstituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Ambiente INIBIOMA, CONICET-UNComa, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America.
Kirk R JohnsonDepartment of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC United States of America.
Talia S KarimUniversity of Colorado Museum of Natural History, Boulder, CO 80503, USA University of Colorado Museum of Natural History Boulder United States of America.
Xiaoyu ZouDepartment of Geosciences and Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Pennsylvania State University University Park United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaves are the most abundant and visible plant organ, both in the modern world and the fossil record. Identifying foliage to the correct plant family based on leaf architecture is a fundamental botanical skill that is also critical for isolated fossil leaves, which often, especially in the Cenozoic, represent extinct genera and species from extant families. Resources focused on leaf identification are remarkably scarce; however, the situation has improved due to the recent proliferation of digitized herbarium material, live-plant identification applications, and online collections of cleared and fossil leaf images. Nevertheless, the need remains for a specialized image dataset for comparative leaf architecture. We address this gap by assembling an open-access database of 30,252 images of vouchered leaf specimens vetted to family level, primarily of angiosperms, including 26,176 images of cleared and x-rayed leaves representing 354 families and 4,076 of fossil leaves from 48 families. The images maintain original resolution, have user-friendly filenames, and are vetted using APG and modern paleobotanical standards. The cleared and x-rayed leaves include the Jack A. Wolfe and Leo J. Hickey contributions to the National Cleared Leaf Collection and a collection of high-resolution scanned x-ray negatives, housed in the Division of Paleobotany, Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C.; and the Daniel I. Axelrod Cleared Leaf Collection, housed at the University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley. The fossil images include a sampling of Late Cretaceous to Eocene paleobotanical sites from the Western Hemisphere held at numerous institutions, especially from Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument (late Eocene, Colorado), as well as several other localities from the Late Cretaceous to Eocene of the Western USA and the early Paleogene of Colombia and southern Argentina. The dataset facilitates new research and education opportunities in paleobotany, comparative leaf architecture, systematics, and machine learning.

Indexed as

Angiospermscleared leavesdata sciencefossil leavesleaf architecturepaleobotany

Identifiers

PMID35068970
PMCPMC8702526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.