Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35068929›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Beyond Dual Bronchodilation - Triple Therapy, When and Why.

Mario Cazzola, Paola Rogliani, Rossella Laitano, Luigino Calzetta, Maria Gabriella Matera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Regenerative and translational medicine in COPD: hype and hope.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Clinical Concepts for Triple Therapy Use in Patients with COPD: A Delphi Consensus.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mario CazzolaUnit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4895-9707
Paola RoglianiUnit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-5040
Rossella LaitanoUnit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Luigino CalzettaUnit of Respiratory Diseases and Lung Function, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0456-069X
Maria Gabriella MateraUnit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although pharmacological treatment of COPD is codified in different guidelines and strategy documents, there is abundant evidence of discrepancy between what they suggest and what health professionals prescribe, especially in low-risk groups where there is widespread overprescription of triple therapy. It is therefore necessary to clarify when the use of triple therapy is indicated in COPD patients and when it is preferable to maintain treatment with dual bronchodilation. In this article, we discuss our views based on our experience and what is reported in the literature and try to give answers to these two questions. The evidence generated by pivotal RCTs supports the use of triple therapy in patients who present for the first time and have severe airway obstruction, are symptomatic, have had frequent moderate or severe exacerbations in the previous year, and have peripheral eosinophilia. However, it is difficult to determine whether step-up is useful in all other cases because the available data are quite conflicting. It is likely that the inconsistency in the information generated by the various available studies may explain the prescribing behaviour of many physicians who do not adhere to recommendations of guidelines and strategies. However, it is necessary to establish whether and when the addition of an ICS to the LAMA/LABA combination is effective, to determine whether triple therapy can induce an additional clinical benefit over dual bronchodilation, irrespective of a preventive effect on COPD exacerbations, to establish its value, and to examine whether cost differences can support the use of triple therapy over combined LAMA/LABA therapy in real life.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsMuscarinic Antagonistsdual bronchodilationICSsLABsLAMAstriple therapy

Identifiers

PMID35068929
PMCPMC8766250
OpenAlexW4205533045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.