ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2022
Prognostic Significance of Controlling Nutritional Status Score (CONUT) in Patients Undergoing Pericardiocentesis.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Immune Nutrition Indices with the Risk of All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure in the NHANES (1999-2018).Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Clinico-Epidemiological Profile of Children Admitted with Pericardial Effusion in a Tertiary Care Hospital: An Observational Study.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalnutrition is associated with a poor prognosis in cardiovascular diseases, however the prognostic impact of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in patients with pericardial effusion (PE) is not known.
methodsThis was a retrospective study conducted among 301 consecutive patients with PE who underwent pericardiocentesis. CONUT score was calculated from serum albumin level, total cholesterol level and lymphocyte count. The prognostic role of admission CONUT score on long-term mortality was evaluated.
resultsThe patients were divided into two groups according to long-term mortality. A total of 131 patients died during follow-up. In multivariable regression analysis, chronic heart failure [hazard ratio (HR): 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-8.70, p < 0.01], malignancy (HR: 5.67, 95% CI: 3.34-9.63, p < 0.01) and CONUT score (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10-1.33, p < 0.01) were found to be independent predictors of long-term mortality. CONUT score was significantly higher in the patients who died (5.8 ± 2.4 vs. 3.6 ± 2.2, p < 0.01). In receiver operating characteristics analysis, a CONUT score ≥ 4.5 predicted long-term mortality with 66% sensitivity and 69% specificity (area under curve: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.67-0.79, p < 0.01).
conclusionsIn patients with PE, CONUT score is an independent prognostic factor for mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.