ArticleApplied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2022
Cloud vendor selection for the healthcare industry using a big data-driven decision model with probabilistic linguistic information.
Article in Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transforming healthcare using big data: a systematic and bibliometric review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- A method for multi-criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic term based on cloud TOPSIS.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-12-13Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Rogue Editor · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of cloud services in the data-intensive industry is indispensable. Cision recently reported that the cloud market would grow to 55 billion USD, with an active contribution of the cloud to healthcare around 2025. Inspired by the report, cloud vendors expand their market and the quality of services to seek growth globally. The rapid growth of the cloud sector in the healthcare industry imposes a challenge: making a rational choice of a cloud vendor (CV) out of a diverse set of vendors. Typically, the healthcare industry 4.0 sees the issue as a large-scale group decision-making problem. Previous studies on a CV selection face certain challenges, such as (i) a lack of the ability to handle multiple users' views, as well as experts'/users' complex linguistic views; (ii) the confidence level associated with a view is not considered; (iii) the transformation of multiple users' views into holistic data is lacking; and (iv) the systematic prioritization of CVs with minimum human intervention is a crucial task. Motivated by these challenges and circumventing them, a new big data-driven decision model is put forward in this paper. Initially, the data in the form of complex expressions are collected from multiple cloud users and are further transformed into a holistic decision matrix by adopting probabilistic linguistic information (PLI). PLI represents complex linguistic expressions along with the associated confidence levels. Later, a holistic decision matrix is formed with the missing values imputed by proposing an imputation algorithm. Furthermore, the criteria weights are determined by using a newly proposed mathematical model and partial information. Finally, the evaluation based on the distance from average solution (EDAS) approach is extended to PLI for the rational ranking of CVs. A real-time example of a CV selection for a healthcare center in India is exemplified so as to demonstrate the usefulness of the model, and the comparison reveals the merits and limitations of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.