Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35068590›Full record

ArticleOutlook on agriculture2021

Gender inclusivity through maize breeding in Africa: A review of the issues and options for future engagement.

Rachel C Voss, Jason Donovan, Pieter Rutsaert, Jill E Cairns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Outlook on agriculture, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel C VossInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0890-830X
Jason DonovanInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-7451
Pieter RutsaertInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9691-6088
Jill E CairnsInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Harare, MP, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2735-3485

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-003439Gates Foundation INV-018951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the prioritization of social inclusion in agricultural development, donors and research centers have shown growing interest in gender-intentional varietal development and delivery. Breeding maize varieties that respond to gender-based differences in trait preferences now represents a central objective of maize R&D in the CGIAR and elsewhere. Drawing on literature on gender and maize seed adoption, variety preferences, and seed system constraints, we take stock of knowns and unknowns related to gender-responsive and gender-intentional maize breeding. While recent research on farmers' variety preferences across crops has yielded insights into gender-based differences, we find that evidence of gender-differentiated preferences for maize varieties remains inconclusive. Ultimately, we identify several research priorities to support gender-intentional maize breeding, including a more nuanced understanding of gender relations in maize production and maize seed decision-making, new and more gender-responsive approaches to measuring farmer preferences and seed demand more broadly, and research to address operational challenges in gender-intentional breeding. We close by identifying some institutional constraints to achieving impact through gender-intentional maize breeding.

Indexed as

Africacrop breedingfarmer preferencesGenderimproved seedsmaize

Identifiers

PMID35068590
PMCPMC8772246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.