Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35068574›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2022

Microbiological quality of tempeh with different wraps: banana leaf versus plastic.

Muhammad Erdiansyah, Anja Meryandini, Michael Wijaya, Antonius Suwanto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad ErdiansyahGraduate School of Biotechnology, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor, 16680 Indonesia.
Anja MeryandiniBiology Departement, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor, 16880 Indonesia.
Michael WijayaBiotechnology Research and Development, PT Wilmar Benih Indonesia, Bekasi, 17530 Indonesia.
Antonius SuwantoBiology Departement, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor, 16880 Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tempeh is a traditional Indonesian fermented food widely consumed and became staple food in some Indonesian diet. Commercially, tempeh is available in banana leaf or plastic wraps. The wraps are not only important for fermentation and giving final form of tempeh,  but also potential source of food microbiome. This study aimed to investigate the effect of different packaging materials on the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) quantity and community composition of tempeh from three manufacturers with different production environments. Each tempeh wrapped with banana leaf or plastic during the fermentation process and then LAB from every tempeh sample were quantified using qPCR and plate count method. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism analysis was carried out to assign bacterial community composition from these samples. The LAB population quantity of fresh tempeh from three manufacturers were essentially similar around 10 log CFU/g. However, there is a difference in the proportion of cultured and uncultured bacteria. Principal Coordinate Analyses based on Bray-Curtis similarity matrices showed an apparent clustering pattern for tempeh samples according to tempeh manufacturers. Meanwhile, packaging materials did not significantly influence changes in  bacterial community composition. The result of this work could be used for determination, authentication, and improvement of tempeh quality.

Indexed as

Banana leafLactic acid bacteriaQuantitative PCRTempehTerminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID35068574
PMCPMC8758877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.