Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35068547›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science and technology2022

Quality improvement of bamboo shoots by removal of antinutrients using different processing techniques: A review.

Nirmala Chongtham, Madho Singh Bisht, Thounaojam Premlata, Harjit Kaur Bajwa, Vivek Sharma, Oinam Santosh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Ethnobotanical review of traditional use of wild food plants in Japan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Shoot Nutrition and Flavor Variation in TwoFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nirmala ChongthamDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7969-3492
Madho Singh BishtDepartment of Environmental Studies, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India.
Thounaojam PremlataDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Harjit Kaur BajwaDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Vivek SharmaDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Oinam SantoshDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bamboo shoot is highly nutritious and contains a plethora of health-promoting bioactive compounds. It is a valuable source of food for Asiatic countries but it contains some antinutrients such as cyanogenic glycosides, glucosinolates, tannins, oxalates and phytates which deter its consumption due to safety issues. The most predominant antinutrient in bamboo shoot is cyanogenic glycosides. It causes increase in blood glucose and lactic acid levels and a decrease in the ATP/ADP ratio indicating the shift from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism. The anti-nutrients such as phytate can cause vitamins and minerals deficiencies. Though anti-nutrients may have deleterious effect when present in high concentration, they may also exert beneficial health effects at low concentrations. In order to eliminate or reduce the level of anti-nutrients to barest minimum, appropriate processing techniques such as soaking, boiling, drying and fermentation can be used. The cyanogen content in bamboo shoots range from 36.32 to more than 1000 mg/kg. Impact of different processing techniques revealed that, fermentation is the best method for reducing the antinutrient content and improving the quality of bamboo shoots as well as increasing the shelf life of the shoots.

Indexed as

AntinutrientsBamboo shootsCyanogenic glucosidesProcessing

Identifiers

PMID35068547
PMCPMC8758816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.