Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35068243›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Evidence of Potential Discriminatory HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Prescribing Practices for People Who Inject Drugs Among a Small Percentage of Providers in the U.S.

Benedikt Pleuhs, Colleen B Mistler, Katherine G Quinn, Julia Dickson-Gomez, Jennifer L Walsh, Andrew E Petroll, Steven A John

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Implicit Bias in Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benedikt PleuhsMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Colleen B MistlerUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Katherine G QuinnMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Julia Dickson-GomezMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Jennifer L WalshMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Andrew E PetrollMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Steven A JohnMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1316-3920
Medical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

QUANTITATIVE COREP30MH052776 · NIMH · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI KELLY, JEFFREY A · 1994 to 2018
$33.2M
Optimizing an IMB-guided intervention to support HIV self-testing and PrEP uptake among YMSM: A pilot factorial RCTK01MH118939 · NIMH · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI JOHN, STEVEN A · 2019 to 2023
$630k
The Effect of Intersecting Stigmas on PrEP Outcomes for Young Black MSMK01MH112412 · NIMH · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI QUINN, KATHERINE G · 2017 to 2020
$527k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH112412NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH118939NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH052776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA large percentage of people who inject drugs (PWID) are living with HIV. Yet, rates of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among PWID remain low. Stigma surrounding substance use and PWID have been identified as potential barriers to PrEP. This study examined healthcare providers' concerns regarding PWID and willingness to prescribe PrEP to PWID.

methodsAn online, cross-sectional survey of a diverse group of healthcare providers in the 10 U.S. cities with the greatest HIV prevalence was conducted between July 2014 and May 2015. Participants responded to a patient vignette of a PWID and asked to indicate whether the patient would be a candidate for PrEP and why via free-response text. Descriptive statistics are reported using frequency measures. Bivariate analyses were conducted using chi-squared comparisons and logistical regression.

resultsSurvey data from 480 providers were included in analyses. Of the 480 responses, 85.5% were classified as PrEP aware, while 14.2% were PrEP unaware. Additionally, 82.6% indicated the patient would be a good candidate for PrEP, 4.4% believed the patient was not a good candidate for PrEP, and 13% were unsure. Among those who were unsure or would not prescribe PrEP (n = 84), open-ended responses indicated lack of knowledge (42.9%), concern about adherence (27.4%), concern about cost (4.8%), and bias (7.1%) as the primary reasons.

conclusionsAlthough the majority of providers in this study did not demonstrate bias against PWID, our study found that limited PrEP knowledge and bias are barriers to PrEP prescription among PWID for some providers. Interventions are needed that increase PrEP awareness of CDC guidelines and reduce implicit bias among providers.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsDrug UsersHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSubstance Abuse, IntravenousCross-Sectional StudiesHumansAnti-HIV AgentsHIVinjection drug userspeople who inject drugspre-exposure prophylaxisproviders

Identifiers

PMID35068243
PMCPMC8796077
OpenAlexW4206932337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.