ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2022
Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Pharmacological Profiling of Psychotherapeutic Drugs Reveals a Functional Taxonomy Based on Direct Inhibition of Smooth Muscle Excitability.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biogenic Synthesis, Structural Characterization, and Biological Evaluation of Nanoparticles Derived fromNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dissecting Tunica Responsibility in Arterial Stress Relaxation: Smooth Muscle Need Not Apply.Journal of vascular research · 2025Article
- The Impact of High-Fructose Diet and Co-Sensitization to House Dust Mites and Ragweed Pollen on the Modulation of Airway Reactivity and Serum Biomarkers in Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The Effects of Interphase and Interpulse Delays and Pulse Widths on Induced Muscle Contractions, Pain and Therapeutic Efficacy in Electroporation-Based Therapies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Drug-Delivery Silver Nanoparticles: A New Perspective for Phenindione as an Anticoagulant.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- The effect of a long-term treatment with cannabidiol-rich hemp extract oil on the adenosinergic system of the zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rat atrium.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The isolated tissue bath research methodology was first developed in 1904. Since then, it has been recognized as an important tool in pharmacology and physiology research, including investigations into neuromuscular disorders. The tissue bath is still used routinely as the instrument for performing the "gold standard" test for clinical diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility - the caffeine-halothane contracture test. Our research group has utilized this tool for several decades for a range of research studies, and we are currently one of four North American diagnostic centers for determining susceptibility for malignant hyperthermia. This review provides a brief summary of some of the historical uses of the tissue bath. Important experimental considerations for the operation of the tissue bath are further described. Finally, we discuss the different studies our group has performed using isolated tissue baths to highlight the broad potential applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.