Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35068064›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2022

Diagnostic utility of GDF15 in neurodegenerative diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xin-Hong Xue, Lin-Lin Tao, Dao-Qing Su, Cun-Ju Guo, Hong Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. GDF15 Is Elevated in Eating Disorders and Is Involved in the Gut-Brain Axis via Ghrelin.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. CSF IL-6, GDF-15, GFAP and NfL levels in early Alzheimer disease: a pilot study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin-Hong XueDepartment of Neurology, Liaocheng Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Lin-Lin TaoDepartment of Neurology, Liaocheng Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Dao-Qing SuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Liaocheng Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Cun-Ju GuoDepartment of Neurology, Liaocheng Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Hong LiuDepartment of Neurology, Liaocheng Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5725-0006
Liaocheng People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGDF15 may be a potential biomarker for neurodegenerative diseases. In this analysis, we aimed to quantitative analysis the levels of GDF15 in patients with neurological diseases and in health control, and then to determine its potential diagnostic utility.

methodsTwo researchers separately conducted a systematic search of the relevant studies up to January 2021 in Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. Effect sizes were estimated to use the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC) method. The sensitivity analysis was performed by the "one-in/one-out" approach. Considering the considerable heterogeneity among studies, random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis investigation.

resultsA total of eight articles were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review. The pooled results of the random effect model indicated GDF15 levels were significantly higher in patients with neurodegenerative disease than healthy people (SMD = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.44-1.40, Z = 3.75, p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of biomarker of GDF15 were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.75-0.97), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.67-0.65), and AUC = 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90), respectively.

conclusionsGDF15 levels were higher in patients with neurodegenerative disease than healthy people. And serum levels of GDF15 were a better marker for diagnostic utility of neurodegenerative disease.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesBiomarkersGrowth Differentiation Factor 15HumansROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersGDF15 protein, humanGrowth Differentiation Factor 15diagnostic utilityGDF15meta-analysisneurodegenerative diseases

Identifiers

PMID35068064
PMCPMC8865151
OpenAlexW4206995326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.