Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35067940›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Pediatric chest-abdomen-pelvis and abdomen-pelvis CT images with expert organ contours.

Petr Jordan, Philip M Adamson, Vrunda Bhattbhatt, Surabhi Beriwal, Sangyu Shen, Oskar Radermecker, Supratik Bose, Linda S Strain, Michael Offe, David Fraley and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Anatomical study and meta-analysis of the episternal ossicles.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Patient-specific organ dose calculation using automatic segmentation and extension of CT scans.Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Geometric Morphometric Study of Scapular Ontogeny in Modern Humans.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Cancer Imaging.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  15. Age Encoded Adversarial Learning for Pediatric CT Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. National Cancer Institute Imaging Data Commons: Toward Transparency, Reproducibility, and Scalability in Imaging Artificial Intelligence.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Petr JordanVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Philip M AdamsonVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Vrunda BhattbhattVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Surabhi BeriwalVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Sangyu ShenVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Oskar RadermeckerVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Supratik BoseVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Linda S StrainChildren's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Michael OffeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
David FraleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Sara PrincipiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Dong Hye YeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Adam S WangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
John van HeterenVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Nghia-Jack VoDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Taly Gilat SchmidtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

Software tool for routine, rapid, patient-specific CT organ dose estimationU01EB023822 · NIBIB · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMIDT, TALY GILAT, VAN HETEREN, JOHN · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB023822NIH HHS U01EB023822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOrgan autosegmentation efforts to date have largely been focused on adult populations, due to limited availability of pediatric training data. Pediatric patients may present additional challenges for organ segmentation. This paper describes a dataset of 359 pediatric chest-abdomen-pelvis and abdomen-pelvis Computed Tomography (CT) images with expert contours of up to 29 anatomical organ structures to aid in the evaluation and development of autosegmentation algorithms for pediatric CT imaging. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION

methodsThe dataset collection consists of axial CT images in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format of 180 male and 179 female pediatric chest-abdomen-pelvis or abdomen-pelvis exams acquired from one of three CT scanners at Children's Wisconsin. The datasets represent random pediatric cases based upon routine clinical indications. Subjects ranged in age from 5 days to 16 years, with a mean age of 7 years. The CT acquisition, contrast, and reconstruction protocols varied across the scanner models and patients, with specifications available in the DICOM headers. Expert contours were manually labeled for up to 29 organ structures per subject. Not all contours are available for all subjects, due to limited field of view or unreliable contouring due to high noise. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: The data are available on The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA_ (https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/) under the collection Pediatric-CT-SEG. The axial CT image slices for each subject are available in DICOM format. The expert contours are stored in a single DICOM RTSTRUCT file for each subject. The contour names are listed in Table 2. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: This dataset will enable the evaluation and development of organ autosegmentation algorithms for pediatric populations, which exhibit variations in organ shape and size across age. Automated organ segmentation from CT images has numerous applications including radiation therapy, diagnostic tasks, surgical planning, and patient-specific organ dose estimation.

Indexed as

AbdomenTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAlgorithmsChildFemaleHumansMalePelvisTomography Scanners, X-Ray Computedautomatic segmentationconvolutional neural networksCTpediatric

Identifiers

PMID35067940
PMCPMC9090951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.