ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Application of artificial intelligence based on synchrosqueezed wavelet transform and improved deep extreme learning machine in water quality prediction.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water quality prediction is the basis for the prevention and control of water pollution. In this paper, to address the problem of low prediction accuracy of existing empirical models due to the non-smoothness and nonlinearity of water quality series, a novel water quality forecasting model integrating synchrosqueezed wavelet transform and deep extreme learning machine optimized with the sparrow search algorithm (SWT-SSA-DELM) was proposed. First, the water quality series was denoised by SWT to reduce the non-stationarity and randomness of water quality series. Then, construct DELM by combining ELM and an autoencoder, and an innovative metaheuristic algorithm, SSA, was used to optimize the hyperparameters of the DELM. Finally, the constructed feature vector was used as the input of the DELM, and the proposed water quality prediction model SWT-SSA-DELM was trained and tested with the data sets of Xinchengqiao and Xiaolangdi in the Yellow River Basin, China. Models such as ELM and DELM alone, as well as their improved form based on ensemble learning, long short-term memory network (LSTM), autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) were adopted as comparison models. The results make it evident that the model presented, linking the ability to ensure convergence to the global optima of the SSA with the nonlinear mapping of the DELM, outperforms similar models in terms of predictive performance, with average MAE, MAPE, and RMSE of 0.15, 2.02%, and 0.21 in the test stage, which is 72.82%, 72.88%, and 74.32% lower than the baseline ELM model, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35067886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.