Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022
Quality of life after stroke: a longitudinal analysis of a cluster randomized trial.
Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between Marital/Partner Status and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Dyad interventions for health-related quality of life, activity, and participation after stroke: a systematic review.Disability and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of depression on stroke outcomes among stroke survivors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Framingham Risk Score Prediction at 12 Months in the STANDFIRM Randomized Control Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of an Individualised Management Program after Stroke: A Trial-Based Economic Evaluation.Neuroepidemiology · 2024Trial
- Changes in Frailty, Depression, and Loneliness among Stroke Survivors and Their Spouses.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on functioning and quality of life in stroke survivors: a longitudinal retrospective analysis.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Observational
- Nutritional and social support enhance cognitive function in acute cerebral infarction patients.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- A higher burden of post-stroke depression and anxiety and their predictors among stroke survivors in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, in 2024: a prospective multicenter study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of a Government Policy to Incentivise Chronic Disease Management following Stroke: A Modelling Study.Neuroepidemiology · 2024Article
- Leveraging Mobile Health to Manage Mental Health/Behavioral Health Disorders: Systematic Literature Review.JMIR mental health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHealth-related quality of life (QoL) is poor after stroke, but may be improved with comprehensive care plans. We aimed to determine the effects of an individualized management program on QoL in people with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), describe changes in QoL over time, and identify variables associated with QoL.
methodsThis was a multicenter, cluster randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis. Patients with stroke or TIA aged ≥ 18 years were randomized by general practice to receive usual care or an intervention comprising a tailored chronic disease management plan and education. QoL was assessed at baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline using the Assessment of Quality of Life instrument. Patient responses were converted to utility scores ranging from - 0.04 (worse than death) to 1.00 (good health). Mixed-effects models were used for analyses.
resultsAmong 563 participants recruited (mean age 68.4 years, 64.5% male), median utility scores ranged from 0.700 to 0.772 at different time points, with no difference observed between intervention and usual care groups. QoL improved significantly from baseline to 3 months (ß = 0.019; P = 0.015) and 12 months (ß = 0.033; P < 0.001), but not from baseline to 24 months (ß = 0.013; P = 0.140) in both groups combined. Older age, females, lower educational attainment, greater handicap, anxiety and depression were longitudinally associated with poor QoL.
conclusionAn individualized management program did not improve QoL over 24 months. Those who are older, female, with lower educational attainment, greater anxiety, depression and handicap may require greater support. CLINICAL
trial registrationhttps://www.anzctr.org.au . Unique identifier: ACTRN12608000166370.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.