Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35067739›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Bodily, emotional, and public sphere at the time of COVID-19. An investigation on concrete and abstract concepts.

Claudia Mazzuca, Ilenia Falcinelli, Arthur-Henri Michalland, Luca Tummolini, Anna M Borghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Water Is and Is Not HCognitive science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Abstract concepts and simulated competition.Psychological research · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Concepts, abstractness and inner speech.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia MazzucaDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. mazzuca.claudia@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1568-2425
Ilenia FalcinelliDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Arthur-Henri MichallandUniversity of Montpellier, LIFAM, Montpellier, France.
Luca TummoliniInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italian National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Anna M BorghiDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. anna.borghi@uniroma1.it.

Funding

european regional development fund (erdf) 182117SRhorizon 2020 framework programme 952324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of Covid-19 pandemics has dramatically affected people's lives. Among newly established practices, it has likely enriched our conceptual representations with new components. We tested this by asking Italian participants during the first lockdown to rate a set of diverse words on several crucial dimensions. We found concepts are organized along a main axis opposing internal and external grounding, with fine-grained distinctions within the two categories underlining the role of emotions. We also show through a comparison with existing data that Covid-19 impacted the organization of conceptual representations. For instance, subclasses of abstract concepts that are usually distinct converge into a unitary group, characterized by emotions and internal grounding. Additionally, we found institutional and Covid-19 related concepts, for which participants felt more the need for others to understand the meaning, clustered together. Our results show that the spread of Covid-19 has simultaneously changed our lives and shaped our conceptual representations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlConcept FormationEmotionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID35067739
PMCPMC8784207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.