Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35067229›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2022

Decolonizing global health: what should be the target of this movement and where does it lead us?

Xiaoxiao Kwete, Kun Tang, Lucy Chen, Ran Ren, Qi Chen, Zhenru Wu, Yi Cai, Hao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Oral Cancer Prognostic Disparities among Black Individuals: A Scoping Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Missed Nuances in Tuberculosis Research: Reflections from a Tibetan Scholar.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2025
    Article
  16. Decolonizing global health: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The role of advocacy and policy in advancing global neurosurgery.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoxiao KweteGlobal Health Research and Consulting, Yaozhi, Yangzhou, China. xiaoxiaokwete@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1535-1068
Kun TangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Lucy ChenNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Ran RenGlobal Health Research Center, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Qi ChenInstitute for Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Zhenru WuInstitute for the World Economy, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yi CaiGlobal Health Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hao LiGlobal Health Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current decolonizing global health movement is calling us to take a post-colonial perspective at the research and practice of global health, an area that has been re-defined by contemporary scholars and advocates with the purpose of promoting equity and justice. In this article, we summarize the main points of discussion from the Symposium organized by the editorial board of Global Health Research and Policy, convened in July 2021 in Wuhan, China. Experts participating in the symposium discussed what decolonizing global health means, how to decolonize it, and what criteria to apply in measuring its completion. Through the meeting, a consensus was reached that the current status quo of global health is still replete with various forms of colonial vestiges-ideologies and practices-, and to fully decolonize global health, systemic reforms must be taken that target the fundamental assumptions of global health: does investment in global health bring socioeconomic development, or is it the other way around? Three levels of colonial vestiges in global health were raised and one guiding principle was proposed when thinking of solutions for them. More theoretical discussion needs to be explored to guide practices to decolonize global health.

Indexed as

ColonialismGlobal HealthChinaSocial JusticeDecolonizationGlobal healthPost-colonialism

Identifiers

PMID35067229
PMCPMC8784247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.