Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35067209›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychoactive drugs

Using Decision Trees to Identify Salient Predictors of Cannabis-Related Outcomes.

Frank J Schwebel, Dylan K Richards, Rory A Pfund, Verlin W Joseph, Matthew R Pearson, Marijuana Outcomes Study Team

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychoactive drugs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Using classification trees to identify psychotherapy patients at risk for poor treatment adherence.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank J SchwebelCenter on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Dylan K RichardsCenter on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Rory A PfundCenter on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Verlin W JosephCenter on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9444-4539
Matthew R PearsonCenter on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Marijuana Outcomes Study Team
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

Alcohol Research Training: Methods & MechanismsT32AA018108 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2010 to 2026
$5.6M
Efficacy and neurobiological mechanisms of mobile-delivered cognitive retrainingK01AA023233 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI PEARSON, MATTHEW RYAN · 2014 to 2018
$832k
An Ecologically Valid Application of Self-Determination Theory to Understand Responsible Alcohol UseF32AA028712 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI RICHARDS, DYLAN K · 2020 to 2022
$189k
NIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA028712NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA023233NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA018108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis use continues to escalate among emerging adults and college attendance may be a risk factor for use. Severe cases of cannabis use can escalate to a cannabis use disorder, which is associated with worse psychosocial functioning. Predictors of cannabis use consequences and cannabis use disorder symptom severity have been identified; however, they typically employ a narrow set of predictors and rely on linear models. Machine learning is well suited for exploratory data analyses of high-dimensional data. This study applied decision tree learning to identify predictors of cannabis user status, negative cannabis-related consequences, and cannabis use disorder symptoms. Undergraduate college students (N = 7000) were recruited from nine universities in nine states across the U.S. Among the 7 trees, 24 splits created by 15 distinct predictors were identified. Consistent with prior research, one's beliefs about cannabis were strong predictors of user status. Negative reinforcement cannabis use motives were the most consistent predictors of cannabis use disorder symptoms, and past month cannabis use was the most consistent predictor of probable cannabis use disorder. Typical frequency of cannabis use was the only predictor of negative cannabis-related consequences. Our results demonstrate that decision trees are a useful methodological tool for identifying targets for future clinical research.

Indexed as

CannabisMarijuana AbuseDecision TreesHumansUniversitiescannabiscollege studentsdecision treeMachine learningrecursive partitioning

Identifiers

PMID35067209
PMCPMC9308832
OpenAlexW4206909702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.