Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066964›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Understanding and measuring the work-related quality of life among those working in adult social care: A scoping review.

Barbora Silarova, Nadia Brookes, Sinead Palmer, Ann-Marie Towers, Shereen Hussein

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  4. Work-Related Quality of Life and Well-Being of Social Care Workers in the Disability Sector in Ireland.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Developing a Scale of Care Work-Related Quality of Life (CWRQoL) for Long-Term Care Workers in England.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbora SilarovaPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Cornwallis Central, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-2527
Nadia BrookesPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Cornwallis Central, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6661-2814
Sinead PalmerPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Cornwallis Central, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8106-3078
Ann-Marie TowersCentre For Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-1061
Shereen HusseinPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Cornwallis Central, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-0717

Funding

National Institute for Health Research NIHR200070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main aim of this scoping review was to understand how work-related quality of life (WRQoL) in adult social care has been defined and measured in the literature and to map key components of WRQoL among those working in adult social care and similar contexts. The scoping review included studies that: 1- focused on WRQoL/work-related wellbeing (and their synonyms); and 2- included adult social care or community health care. We searched existing evidence from November 2019 until July 2020 through an electronic literature search of eight major databases complemented by the grey literature, searching the reference lists and by contacting our existing network of experts in the field. In addition, we repeated the searches to identify any relevant literature published in 2021. Reporting followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. In total, we included 68 publications. These publications indicate that there is an absence of agreement on a definition and measurement of WRQoL in adult social care. Based on a thematic analysis we identified six key components of WRQoL: organisational characteristics; job characteristics; mental wellbeing and health; physical wellbeing and health; spill-over from work to home; and professional identity. In summary, at the moment, there is no agreement on what WRQoL is and how to measure it in adult social care. As a result, there is very limited evidence on how to improve WRQoL among people working in adult social care. However, this scoping review suggests that there are six key components of WRQoL that researchers may consider to include in their future studies.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSocial SupportAdultChecklistHumansPopulation Groupscarercare staffcare workeremployeejob-related well-beingsupport workerwork-related wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35066964
PMCPMC9543435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.