Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066898›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Effects of T

Michael A Malmberg, Henrik Odéen, Dennis L Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael A MalmbergDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Henrik OdéenDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Dennis L ParkerDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

Validation and translation of a non-invasive, MR-guided breast cancer therapyR37CA224141 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PAYNE, ALLISON · 2018 to 2024
$3.7M
Toward the next generation in transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound: Innovations in thermal and acoustic model-based planning and monitoring for improved safety, efficacy and efficiencyR01EB028316 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PARKER, DENNIS L, RIEKE, VIOLA · 2019 to 2022
$2.5M
Advanced Treatment Endpoint Assessment in MR-guided Focused UltrasoundR03EB029204 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ODEEN, HENRIK CARL AXEL · 2020 to 2021
$153k
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA224141NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028316NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB029204NIH HHS R01EB028316NIH HHS R03EB029204NIH HHS R37CA224141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study in simulation and in theory the accuracy and precision of dynamic T

methodsMonte Carlo simulations were performed over 1000 noisy iterations for the VFA method, the SR-VFA method, and a proposed method, SR-VFA with a T

resultsSubstantial bias can be produced by the SR-VFA method when the ratio of the T

conclusionsMultiecho SR-VFA-T

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingComputer SimulationMonte Carlo MethodPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of Resultsaccuracy and precisionDCE-MRIMRTIquantitative imagingsingle reference variable flip angleT1 mappingVFA

Identifiers

PMID35066898
PMCPMC9007881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.