Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066870›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2022

Exploring physiologic reactions to persuasive information.

Hanne A A Spelt, Luisa Asta, Els T Kersten-van Dijk, Jaap Ham, Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, Joyce H D M Westerink

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanne A A SpeltDigital Engagement, Cognition and Behavior Group, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-4109
Luisa AstaHuman-Technology Interaction Group, Faculty Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Els T Kersten-van DijkHuman-Technology Interaction Group, Faculty Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jaap HamHuman-Technology Interaction Group, Faculty Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1703-5165
Wijnand A IJsselsteijnHuman-Technology Interaction Group, Faculty Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6856-9269
Joyce H D M WesterinkDigital Engagement, Cognition and Behavior Group, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2391-0387
Eindhoven University of Technology · NLPhilips (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persuasion aims at changing peoples' motivations and/or behaviors. This study explores how and when physiology reflects persuasion processes and specifically whether individual differences in motivations and behaviors affect psychophysiologic reactions to persuasive information. Participants (N = 70) with medium or high meat consumption patterns watched a persuasive video advocating limited meat consumption, while their electrodermal and cardiovascular physiology was measured. Results indicated that the video increased participants' moral beliefs, perceived behavioral control, and reduction intentions. This study also found an increase in physiologic arousal during the persuasive video and that people with motivations less aligned to the persuasion objective had more physiologic arousal. The findings encourage further psychophysiologic persuasion research, especially as these insights can potentially be used to personalize persuasive messages of behavior change applications.

Indexed as

IntentionPersuasive CommunicationHumansIndividualityMoralsMotivationaffective computingECGpersonalized persuasive technologiespersuasionpsychophysiology

Identifiers

PMID35066870
PMCPMC9285495
OpenAlexW4206915280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.