Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066707›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2022

Adolescents' Partner Search in the Digital Age: Correlates and Characteristics of Relationships Initiated Online.

Marta Tienda, Rachel E Goldberg, Jay R Westreich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta TiendaPrinceton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. tienda@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9660-8616
Rachel E GoldbergUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Jay R WestreichFannie Mae, Washington DC, District of Columbia, 20005, USA.

Funding

GRADUATE PROGRAM IN DEMOGRAPHYT32HD007163 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 1985 to 2015
$4.3M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD36916-13-G;R01HD39135, and R01HD40421NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital technology and social media platforms have transformed the ways adolescents communicate and cultivate romantic relationships, but few studies consider whether relationships initiated online are less salutary than those formed in person. A sample of 531 adolescents (Mean age = 16.7 years, SD = 0.358; 55% female) was recruited from an ongoing birth cohort study and administered bi-weekly diaries over a year to evaluate the circumstances associated with adolescents' romantic relationship formation and relationship quality. Two-thirds of respondents initiated one or more romantic relationships during the study, of which 15% were initiated online. Girls who did not fit in well at school and who had difficulty making friends were more likely to initiate romantic relationships online than their more sociable peers who fit in well at school; for boys, however, access to mobile devices increased the odds that romantic relationships were initiated online. The diaries captured considerable flux in the evolution of romantic relationships, but there was limited evidence that relationships initiated online involved greater risks, with the notable exception of greater age asymmetry.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAdolescentCohort StudiesFemaleFriendsHumansInterpersonal RelationsMalePeer GroupPsychology, AdolescentAdolescent romantic relationshipsDiary studyGender differencesOnline partner searchRelationship quality

Identifiers

PMID35066707
PMCPMC8881290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.