Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066656›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2022

Impact of pelvic floor muscle strength on female sexual function: retrospective multicentric cross-sectional study.

Luísa Pasqualotto, Cássio Riccetto, Ana Flávia Biella, Joseane Marques, Larissa Carvalho Pereira, Fabíola Kênia Alves, Anna Lygia Barbosa Lunardi, Délcia Barbosa de Vasconcelos Adami, Anita Nagib, Natalia Martinho and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luísa PasqualottoFederal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Motor Science Institute, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cássio RiccettoState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Ana Flávia BiellaState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Joseane MarquesState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Larissa Carvalho PereiraState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Fabíola Kênia AlvesState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Anna Lygia Barbosa LunardiState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Délcia Barbosa de Vasconcelos AdamiState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Anita NagibState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Natalia MartinhoState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Adriana PicciniFederal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Motor Science Institute, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tirza SathlerFederal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Motor Science Institute, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Valeria Regina SilvaState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Simone BotelhoFederal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Motor Science Institute, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. simone.botelho@unifal-mg.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0001-7638-0845
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de Alfenas · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe female pelvic floor muscles (PFM) play an important role in sexual function. We hypothesize that there is a relation between PFM strength and sexual function in women with and without sexual dysfunction.

methodsRetrospective multicentric cross-sectional study including women with and without sexual dysfunction [Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) cutoff point < 26.55], analyzed by age range, considering demographic, clinical, anthropometric and PFM strength [Modified Oxford Scale (MOS)] data. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney test and linear regression (ranks) were used, with 5% significance (SAS 9.4).

resultsOut of 1013 medical records, 982 women with an average age of 45.76 (± 15.25) were included in the study. Of these, 679 (69.14%) presented FSFI score < 26.55, while 303 (30.86%) presented FSFI ≥ 26.55. It was identified that the higher scores were among white women, < 45 years old, single, with higher education, family income > 4 minimum wages, body mass index < 25 kg/m

conclusionDemographic, clinical and anthropometric conditions can influence both PFM strength and female sexual function. Our findings demonstrate that women with higher PFM strength present fewer complaints about sexual dysfunction.

Indexed as

Pelvic FloorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthPregnancyRetrospective StudiesMuscle strengthPelvic floorPelvic floor disordersRehabilitationSexual dysfunctionSexual health

Identifiers

PMID35066656
OpenAlexW4207080471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.