Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066631›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Malignancy risk stratification of cystic renal lesions based on a contrast-enhanced CT-based machine learning model and a clinical decision algorithm.

Jérémy Dana, Thierry L Lefebvre, Peter Savadjiev, Sylvain Bodard, Simon Gauvin, Sahir Rai Bhatnagar, Reza Forghani, Olivier Hélénon, Caroline Reinhold

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cystic renal mass screening: machine-learning-based radiomics on unenhanced computed tomographyDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jérémy DanaAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France.
Thierry L LefebvreMedical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-4848
Peter SavadjievDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Sylvain BodardAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France.
Simon GauvinDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Sahir Rai BhatnagarDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Reza ForghaniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Olivier HélénonAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France.
Caroline ReinholdDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. caroline.reinhold@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8852-3273

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo distinguish benign from malignant cystic renal lesions (CRL) using a contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomics model and a clinical decision algorithm.

methodsThis dual-center retrospective study included patients over 18 years old with CRL between 2005 and 2018. The reference standard was histopathology or 4-year imaging follow-up. Training and testing datasets were acquired from two institutions. Quantitative 3D radiomics analyses were performed on nephrographic phase CT images. Ten-fold cross-validated LASSO regression was applied to the training dataset to identify the most discriminative features. A logistic regression model was trained to classify malignancy and tested on the independent dataset. Reported metrics included areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and balanced accuracy. Decision curve analysis for stratifying patients for surgery was performed in the testing dataset. A decision algorithm was built by combining consensus radiological readings of Bosniak categories and radiomics-based risks.

resultsA total of 149 CRL (139 patients; 65 years [56-72]) were included in the training dataset-35 Bosniak(B)-IIF (8.6% malignancy), 23 B-III (43.5%), and 23 B-IV (87.0%)-and 50 CRL (46 patients; 61 years [51-68]) in the testing dataset-12 B-IIF (8.3%), 10 B-III (60.0%), and 9 B-IV (100%). The machine learning model achieved high diagnostic performance in predicting malignancy in the testing dataset (AUC = 0.96; balanced accuracy = 94%). There was a net benefit across threshold probabilities in using the clinical decision algorithm over management guidelines based on Bosniak categories.

conclusionCT-based radiomics modeling accurately distinguished benign from malignant CRL, outperforming the Bosniak classification. The decision algorithm best stratified lesions for surgery and active surveillance. KEY POINTS: • The radiomics model achieved excellent diagnostic performance in identifying malignant cystic renal lesions in an independent testing dataset (AUC = 0.96). • The machine learning-enhanced decision algorithm outperformed the management guidelines based on the Bosniak classification for stratifying patients to surgical ablation or active surveillance.

Indexed as

Machine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAlgorithmsHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAlgorithmsKidney diseases cysticKidney neoplasmsMachine learningTomography X-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.