Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066617›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Effect of self-expandable metal stent on morbidity and mortality and oncological prognosis in malignant colonic obstruction: retrospective analysis of its use as curative and palliative treatment.

Carlos Bustamante Recuenco, Javier García Septiem, Javier Arias Díaz, Israel John Thuissard Vasallo, Alejandro Andonaegui de la Madriz, Virginia Jiménez Carneros, Jose Luis Ramos Rodríguez, José María Jover Navalón, Francisco Javier Jiménez Miramón

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Bustamante RecuencoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora del Prado, Talavera de la Reina, Spain. carlosb121990@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1411-4140
Javier García SeptiemDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Arias DíazFaculty of Medicine, General Surgery, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Israel John Thuissard VasalloUniversidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Alejandro Andonaegui de la MadrizDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Virginia Jiménez CarnerosDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Luis Ramos RodríguezDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
José María Jover NavalónDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier Jiménez MiramónDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario de Getafe · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESHospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute gastrointestinal obstruction due to colorectal cancer occurs in 7-30% of cases and is an abdominal emergency that requires urgent decompression. The safety and oncological effect of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in these patients remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate its impact on these variables and compare it with that of emergency surgery (ES).

methodsDescriptive, retrospective and single-centre study, performed between 2008 and 2015, with follow-up until 2017. One hundred eleven patients with diagnosis of left malignant colonic obstruction were included and divided according to the treatment received: stent as bridge to surgery (SBTS group: 39), palliative stent (PS group: 30) and emergency surgery with curative (ECS group: 34) or palliative intent (EPS group: 8). Treatment was decided by the attending surgeon in charge.

resultsTechnical and clinical general success rates for colorectal SEMS were 95.7% and 91.3%, respectively, with an associated morbimortality of 23.2%, which was higher in the PS group (p = 0.002). The SBTS group presented a higher laparoscopic approach and primary anastomosis (p < 0.001), as well as a lower colostomy rate than the ECS group (12.8% vs. 40%; p = 0.023). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were significantly lower in the SBTS group compared to the ECS group (41% vs. 67.6%; p = 0.025). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were similar between the analysed groups.

conclusionColonic stent placement is a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to emergency surgery in the management of left-sided malignant colonic obstruction in both curative and palliative fields. It presents a lower postoperative morbimortality and a similar oncological prognosis.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal ObstructionSelf Expandable Metallic StentsHumansMorbidityPalliative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeColonic stentColorectal obstructive cancerMorbidityOncological prognosisPalliative

Identifiers

PMID35066617
OpenAlexW4207046936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.