Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066570›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2022

Triple post transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) based GVHD prophylaxis: HLA matched versus HLA haploidentical transplants.

Eugenio Galli, Elisabetta Metafuni, Sabrina Giammarco, Maria Assunta Limongiello, Idanna Innocenti, Francesco Autore, Luca Laurenti, Federica Sorà, Patrizia Chiusolo, Luciana Teofili and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eugenio GalliSezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy. eug.galli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-916X
Elisabetta MetafuniDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Sabrina GiammarcoDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Maria Assunta LimongielloDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Idanna InnocentiDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Francesco AutoreDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Luca LaurentiSezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Federica SoràSezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-5298
Patrizia ChiusoloSezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-1587
Luciana TeofiliSezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Andrea BacigalupoSezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Simona SicaSezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a retrospective analysis of 198 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY), cyclosporine and mycophenolate mophetil as graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis: the donors were HLA-matched (n = 78), or haploidentical relatives (HAPLO) (n = 120). The two groups were comparable except for older age in the HAPLO group. The main diagnosis were acute leukemia (57%) and myelofibrosis (21%). In the HLA-matched and HAPLO group the outcomes were as follows: aGVHD grade II-IV, 10% vs 27% (p = 0.005); moderate-severe cGVHD, 4% vs 19% (p = 0.004); transplant related mortality (TRM) at 1 year 10% vs 21% (p = 0.04); relapse at 1 year 24% vs 10% (p = 0.051) respectively. Disease free survival (DFS) at 1 year was 65% for matched and 68% for HAPLOs (p = 0.85). DFS and OS were independently predicted by age over 60 and higher DRI, whether the only independent predictive variable for GVHD and relapse free survival (GRFS) was age over 60. In conclusion: given the same PTCY based, GVHD prophylaxis, HLA-mismatched grafts are exposed to a higher risk of acute and chronic GVHD. This translates in increased TRM. DFS is comparable for HLA matched and HAPLO grafts.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteCyclophosphamideHumansRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTransplantation ConditioningCyclophosphamide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.