Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066567›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Species interactions constrain adaptation and preserve ecological stability in an experimental microbial community.

Jake N Barber, Luke C Nicholson, Laura C Woods, Louise M Judd, Aysha L Sezmis, Jane Hawkey, Kathryn E Holt, Michael J McDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jake N BarberSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University: Clayton, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Luke C NicholsonSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University: Clayton, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Laura C WoodsSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University: Clayton, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4525-4760
Louise M JuddDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Aysha L SezmisSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University: Clayton, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Jane HawkeyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9661-5293
Kathryn E HoltDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-2471
Michael J McDonaldSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University: Clayton, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3000, Australia. mike.mcdonald@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-960X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species loss within a microbial community can increase resource availability and spur adaptive evolution. Environmental shifts that cause species loss or fluctuations in community composition are expected to become more common, so it is important to understand the evolutionary forces that shape the stability and function of the emergent community. Here we study experimental cultures of a simple, ecologically stable community of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum, in order to understand how the presence or absence of a species impacts coexistence over evolutionary timescales. We found that evolution in coculture led to drastically altered evolutionary outcomes for L. plantarum, but not S. cerevisiae. Both monoculture- and co-culture-evolved L. plantarum evolved dozens of mutations over 925 generations of evolution, but only L. plantarum that had evolved in isolation from S. cerevisiae lost the capacity to coexist with S. cerevisiae. We find that the evolutionary loss of ecological stability corresponds with fitness differences between monoculture-evolved L. plantarum and S. cerevisiae and genetic changes that repeatedly evolve across the replicate populations of L. plantarum. This work shows how coevolution within a community can prevent destabilising evolution in individual species, thereby preserving ecological diversity and stability, despite rapid adaptation.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAcclimatizationAdaptation, Physiological

Identifiers

PMID35066567
PMCPMC9039033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.